
Sen. Abel Maldonado doesnāt have many Republican friends in Sacramento right now. His vote ensured that the Senate would pass a controversial budget that also came with more than $12 billion in tax increases. That vote has won him praiseāand the wrath of his own party.
Maldonado, a moderate Republican representing the Central Coast, broke one of the cardinal rules in his party: Never increase taxes. He described the mindset of his party as āthe party of no.ā No tax increases. Ever. Party leadership made the message clear.
State Republican leaders swiftly punished Maldonado and five other legislators who voted in line with Democrats. Maldonado was almost publicly reprimanded for his vote (censured); instead, he lost access to party funds.
āWhat theyāre saying to anybody that donates to the Republican party: āWeāre only going to give money to people that we can manipulate,ā Maldonado vented to the Sun.
Backlash over the budget vote goes beyond fundraising. Maldonado hate sites have already sprouted online. Thereās a āNever Elect Abel Maldonado To Anything, Ever Againā Facebook page with more than 600 members. Another website is accepting donations for a Maldonado recall effort.
As the Legislature grinded negotiations on how to fill a $40 billion deficit, Californiaās bond ratings plummeted. Confidence in the stateās economy dwindled. Although far from perfectāand far from beautiful as Maldonado puts itāhis vote secured a budget. But the personal cost for Maldonado was severe. Asked if he feels separated from his party ideologies now, he said simply: āI do.ā
Sen. Dave Cogdill was voted out as minority leader for supporting the budget. Still, Maldonado said he feels particularly picked on. When he walks through the long marble halls of the Capitol, he said, things are different, his relationships have suffered.
āAnd thatās all you have in Sacramento,ā he explained.
Maybe itās because he has nothing to lose, or that he now has a platform with which to raise his voice, but Maldonadoās tone and stern expressions seem to say: To hell with themāit was the right choice.
āIāve got some rebuilding to do,ā he said, ābut during the rebuilding process, theyāre going to come to my side. Iām not going to their side.ā
Years back, Maldonado signed a no new tax pledge, something he seems now to regret, ābecause it should have said no tax increases unless thereās an emergency.ā He described the Republican alternative to this yearās finances as one that would ādecimateā state programs.
Now, better or worse, Maldonadoās name is becoming more popular. Former San Francisco mayor and legislator Willie Brown called him the most unpopular politician in Sacramento in a San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece. The Economist got him international recognition for being one of the few Republicans who would break party norms.
While the senator sat on the steps of the SLO City Hall during an interview, a man walking by casually shouted, āAbel, get āem shaped up, up there. Get Sacramento shaped up.ā
Maldonado provided Democrats the sought-after two-thirds majority needed to pass the budget. Admittedly, he could have haggled an attractive concessions package for his vote. He was offered committee chairmanships, a new larger office, and other perks he declined to detail.
āThey offered me the world,ā he said.
What he got for his vote was the removal of a 12-cent gas tax and $1 million worth of furniture from the Controllerās Office budget (the state controller said money was needed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act), a ballot measure that would ban legislative raises during deficit years, and a ballot measure to create open primaries in California.
Conversely, he said Republicans were willing to just sit idly for political gains and let the state go into bankruptcy.
āWell, they wouldnāt say it in public, but they would sit in committee hearings in our caucus and say, āYou know what, Abel, why do you want to vote for this? Letās let the state go off the cliff; letās let the state go into bankruptcy to prove the other party was wrong all these years.ā And I was not going to hold the people of California hostage, and I was not going to bankrupt the state.ā
If his vote to approve the budget only earned him enemies right of center, the things he added in the budget likely riled members of both parties.
āThere are two people that hate the open primary system: the party bosses on the Republican side and the party bosses on the Democrat side,ā he said. āThey hate it because they wonāt be able to control their members.ā
He spoke extensively and excitedly of ending the hyper partisanship in Sacramento. If nothing else, Maldonadoās ostracization seems to have given him an example of how Sacramento handles its defectors.
The message seems clear from Maldonadoās perspective: Moderates are not welcome. He said his early introduction to state office was, āTake your local government hat off, youāre in the Senate.ā
And if moderates werenāt scared off before, they probably will be now after Maldonadoās fall from grace.
āIt sends the wrong message to anybody that wants to go up there and really focus on public policy that benefits all Californians,ā he said.
As for Abel, he has three more years in the Senateāmaximum. If his party has its way, those could be his last three years in politics. m
Colin Rigley is a staff writer with the Sunās sister paper, New Times in San Luis Obispo. Contact him at crigley@newtimesslo.com.
This article appears in Mar 5-12, 2009.

