
The arbitration hearing for former Santa Maria Police Lt. Dan Ast started up again on July 28 after a month-long hiatus.
Ast and his defense attorney, Jonathan Miller, are arguing that the department retaliated against Ast because he was one of three whistleblowers to file complaints against former Police Chief Dan Macagni alleging widespread problems in the departmentāincluding favoritism, unfair distribution of overtime, and officer misconduct.
Dennis Gonzales, the attorney hired by the city for the hearing, maintains that Ast was fired for misconduct that led to the shooting death of Officer Albert Covarrubias. Supervising officers attempted to arrest Covarrubias in late January 2012 after receiving information that he was having a violent sexual relationship with an underage Police Explorer.
Part two of the hearing kicked off with emotional testimony from Sgt. Chris Nartatez, who blamed Ast for his cousinās death. He also said Astās recollection of the shooting is inconsistent.
Next, former Lt. Rico Floresāwho retired after the shootingātook the stand. He testified that it was highly unusual for two sergeants to appear at a DUI checkpoint, like when Nartatez and Sgt. Mark Norling went to arrest Covarrubias the night of the shooting.
āNartatez did the best he could [to contain Covarrubias],ā Flores said.
He recalled seeing Covarrubias reach for his gun and then watching the officers ātumble into the grassy areaā in a struggle for the weapon.
āMoments later, I heard a shot. I saw a hand with a gun in it in the flower planter,ā Flores said. āSomeone, I think it was me, asked, āWho shot?ā Then I heard a voice behind me: āI did.ā I turned around and it was Matt Kline.ā
He said Kline āwas beside himself, [saying] āI shot my best friend.āā
Later, Flores testified that he was aware that Ast and two other lieutenants had filed complaints against the department alleging, among other things, unsafe working conditions and unfair distribution of overtime.
Miller, Astās attorney, fired question after question at Flores about his actions the night of the shooting, the statements Flores later made to investigators, and whether he was aware of any retaliatory actions taken against Ast.
Miller argued that Flores spurred Ast and the rest of the command staff into action when he alerted traffic officers, including Covarrubias, that supervisors were ālooking into the Police Explorers.ā
āJust before the briefing, I shut it down and sent everyone out that wasnāt traffic-related and had a discussion with the traffic officers,ā Flores said, adding that Ast didnāt tell him to keep the investigation confidential until later that evening.
Flores also denied taking Covarrubias aside to ask him about the Police Explorers. However, one of the explorers did testify that he saw Flores talking to Covarrubias outside the briefing room.
āI was talking to each of the officers as they were coming up,ā Flores said. āI didnāt specifically talk to [Covarrubias] about the case.ā
Gonzales argued that Millerās claims about the alleged conversation between Flores and Covarrubias were purely speculation. He maintained that Ast was the one responsible for planning and executing the arrest, and therefore was the one guilty of misconduct.
The hearing was expected to continue on July 29 after the Sunās deadline.
This article appears in Jul 31 – Aug 7, 2014.

