With her farm and home in jeopardy and at least three banks jostling to recoup their money, Gail Moore and her attorney are trying to figure out why sheās on the hook for a $900,000 loan she claims she never signed.
In fact, two other people have disputed they signed similar documents that bear their names. There is, however, a common thread connecting the three individuals: Mark Moore.

On March 15, New Times and the Sun reported that Mark Moore is being sued by his former CEO for a number of allegations, including sexual battery and wrongful termination. The Nipomo-based Moore owns and operates a number of agricultural chemical companies under the parent company CoreClean, which do business throughout the United States and overseas. He also served as president of the San Luis Obispo County Farm Bureau from 2007 to 2009.
Multiple sources reported or alluded to an FBI loan-fraud investigation involving Moore. CoreCleanās attorney confirmed that the FBI is looking into Moore, though the bureau wouldnāt confirm or deny any such investigation.
On Feb. 23, a handful of attorneys met with a federal bankruptcy attorney to kick off what will likely be a lengthy process of determining whether a $900,000 loan to Moore Agricultural Products was forged, and by whom.
āIām giving you latitude because I think these are important issues, and theyāre going to have to be addressed at some point,ā Greg Powell, an attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice Office of the United States Trustee, told one of the attorneys, according to a court transcript. āBut letās try and keep it civil and straightforward.ā
āI understand,ā said Tom Mouzes, an attorney for Rabobank. āThis is an important issue. Serious allegations that loan documents are forged, and we canāt identify who that person might be.ā
The topic that day was a bankruptcy case filed by Gail Moore, Mark Mooreās mother. According to court documents, Gail Moore was informed after she filed for bankruptcy that she owed Rabobank (formerly Mid-State Bank) $493,069 on a loan to her business drafted in 2006. The original loan was for a principal amount of $900,000, using her personal property, crops, and farm products as collateral.
Rabobank is just one creditor involved in the case. Gail Moore also owes money to Bank of America and Farm Credit West, according to court documents. But unlike the other loans, she claims she never signed the Rabobank documents nor received any money from the bank. In fact, she said she didnāt know anything about the loan until her creditors came knocking after she filed for bankruptcy on Jan. 20 of this year.
āAfter reviewing these documents, Debtor believes that all but one purported signature was not actually hers,ā her attorney, Scott Belden, said in a written court response.
Gail Moore is the sole owner of Moore Agricultural Products, a fertilizer company she and her late husband started in Hanford in the early ā80s. The company stopped doing business about three years ago and is now effectively defunct, with more liabilities than assets, according to Gail Mooreās testimony in the court transcript.
Belden didnāt return calls for comment.
Until recently, she said, she was also receiving paychecks from CoreAgri, one of her sonās companies. According to the court transcript, CoreAgri shares two buildings with Moore Agricultural Products in Hanford and Humboldt, Tenn. Despite occupying the same space as Moore Agricultural Products, CoreAgri owes as much as $80,000 in unpaid rent, according to the transcript.
Gail Moore said she did sign one document, which she claims she signed and returned with little thought when it was mailed to her office.
Michael Cavaletto, Mark Mooreās father-in-law, was listed as a guarantor on the loan and he, too, is disputing that he signed the loan, according to a response letter Belden filed with the court.
Cavaletto didnāt return a call for comment.
Rabobank is investigating the loan and the allegations of forgery, according to court documents.
At the Feb. 23 hearing, Gail Moore refused to speculate who may have forged her signature, despite repeated attempts by Mouzes to get an answer. Belden instructed her not to speculate or name names. With no suspected forger identified, Rabobank claims the loan is legit and itās owed money. In a letter to the court, Mouzes said Gail Moore and her attorney were āstonewallingā the bank by refusing to identify the alleged forger.
In a response to that letter, Belden wrote, āGiven that the funds went to Moore Agricultural Products, Inc., which was then run by a different CEO (who is named at least six times in Rabobanksās status conference statement) Debtor does not believe that her unwillingness to speculate (on the advice of her counsel) constitutes stonewalling the bank.ā
At the time the loan was secured, Mark Moore was the CEO of Moore Agricultural Products. He also ran the financial operations of Moore Agricultural Products, according to his motherās testimony.
Darrell Freeman, formerly of Rabobank, signed off on one of the allegedly forged documents. Freeman said in an interview heās retired from Rabobank, but he declined to comment further, other than acknowledging he knows Mark Moore, who was one of his customers.
āIām just not going to comment on anything,ā he said. āI know Mark, and thatās all Iām going to say.ā
Gail Moore told the court she doesnāt know Freeman.
Mark Mooreās wife, Laurie, has also contested a loan she purportedly signed. In a lawsuit brought by Heritage Oaks Bank, Laurie was listed alongside Mark and his various companiesāCoreClean, American Micro Tech, and Omni Agri, for exampleāas a defendant. The bank alleges both Moores defaulted on loans to the tune of $1.8 million to $2 million. But Laurie claims she didnāt sign off on those documents.
The Sun took three samples of Markās and Laurieās signatures from that lawsuit and others filed previously by Heritage Oaks and Wells Fargo to a handwriting expert. The expert compared those signatures with three other samples from notarized documents filed with the SLO County Clerk-Recorder. The expert said it appeared Laurie didnāt sign the loan documents, but clarified more materials would be needed to make a conclusion that would stand up in court.
However, one of Laurieās attorneys, Santa Barbara-based Nathan Rogers, said sheās disputing most if not all of the signatures purported to be hers. Asked who might have forged her signature, Rogers said, āJust based on different suits that are pending out there and investigations ⦠we canāt comment.ā
One of Markās attorneys, Bruce Zabarauskas, declined to comment when asked if his client was also disputing any of the signatures.
āWeāre not going to comment to the press right now on any of the allegations,ā Zabarauskas said. He referred the Sun to another attorney, Jeff Rutherford, who specializes in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: White Collar & Regulatory Enforcement. Rutherford didnāt return a call for comment.
Mark Moore hasnāt returned calls to his cell phone seeking comment.
Colin Rigley is editor of New Times, the Sunās sister paper to the north. Contact him at crigley@newtimesslo.com.
This article appears in Apr 5-12, 2012.


