Itās not uncommon for Joanne Ruggles to work from nude models. But at her current show, āHanging by a Thread: Mother Earth in Peril,ā itās the artist, and not her subjects, who is exposed. While her gray and black figures are charitably cloaked in abstraction and anonymity, Ruggles is the one whose dreams, hopes, and fears are laid bare.

āIn order to paint anything, I can only paint my story,ā explained the artist and Cal Poly professor. āWhat I see in the model is going to be what resonates with me, no matter whoās modeling for me.ā
The body of work that went into āHanging by a Threadā began three years ago, in Grand Junction, Colo., where Ruggles was leading a life drawing workshop. On a whim, one of the models brought along her exercise ball, thinking she could do some interesting poses with it.
āShe took a couple poses with this ball, and my immediate reaction was, oh my god, this is so maternal: This woman clutching this orb,ā Ruggles remembered. āThese were Mother Earth poses.ā
The maternal figure and the mysterious orb became the predominant motif in her current show, hanging at Alan Hancock Collegeās Ann Foxworthy Gallery. Some of her figures crumple in various expressions of grief, mourning a concrete-scarred planet as a mother would a terminally ill child. Elsewhere, a figure seems to scold her orb-like progeny.
One work depicts a mother and daughter curled up tightly together on the ground.
āThose were two women modeling for me,ā Ruggles explained. āIt was a workshop I was teaching up in Quebec.ā
The tender scene, though staged, had a profound effect.
āTwo of my students had to leave the room in tears because it was so touching, seeing these women compassionately comfort each other,ā Ruggles continued. āOne girl ran out of the room crying, and she said, āMy mother died six months ago. And when I saw that, itās such a beautiful thing, but it makes me think so much of my mother.āā
Another nude figure in the show appears to offer herself up as a sacrifice. She falls to her knees, raising her arms to heaven as if imploring, āTake me instead.ā
[image-2]
No stranger to unconventional mark-making implements, Ruggles has employed a stamping technique to litter the landscape with jumbled lettersāas if to represent the constant clutter of language, obscuring the surface of fine art.
Arms outstretched, the figure divides the large-scale piece into fourths, imbuing the work with a classical, even religious, aestheticāsomething the artist may not have originally intended, but is well aware of.
āMost religious paintings will have that kind of duality, you know: despair and redemption, dark and light. As I worked on it, the more I began to see it. It almost has a crucifixion quality to it,ā Ruggles reflected. āIt has a dark side and a light side. Thereās some light on the dark side; thereās some dark on the light side.ā
Ruggles freely recognizes the religiousāor at least spiritualāquality of the series. That quality, she said, is reflected in the design of the Foxworthy Gallery itself: āIt feels like a sanctuary,ā she said. āThereās a chapel-like quality to the space. For me, it allows the show to be a reverent warning.ā
While the series speaks of human wastefulness and concerns about the future of the planet, nowhere to be seen is the triteness, or worse, trendiness that all too often accompanies these themes. āHanging by a Threadā is too honest, too sincere, for any of that stuff.
Instead, Ruggles often uses unexpected artifactsāa doily, a trivet, random bits of packagingāto leave marks, as if to demonstrate the sort of human detritus that might be found in future decades and used to explain Western civilization.
[image-3]
A work titled A Motherās Dreams depicts a nude woman, head smoothly bald, embracing a large sphere. Her eyes are shut, or cast so far downward that we are unable to see them. Her expression of love is clearly meant only for the precious orb around which her entire being curls. Ruggles clearly holds the piece very dear.
āThe feeling I have about this painting would be very similar to looking at my daughter pregnant,ā she said. āItās that kind of emotional connection.ā
But nowhere is the extremely personal nature of her art more pronounced, more directly confronted, than in a piece called Exhibitionist.
Ruggles often begins in the abstract and waits to see what figures take shape. But in this particular work, which incorporates torn sheets of wallpaper, she saw a version of herself emerge in the empty white space. Indeed, the bare torso of a woman seems to step forward, unbidden, through the dark shapes. Out of this vague, feminine silhouette, the artist coaxed what she referred to as a metaphorical self-portrait. For her, the exposed figure accurately embodied the vulnerability of having oneās sacred creations exhibited publicly.
However, this very exposure, she believes, is also her obligation. Ruggles is deeply influenced by the work of German Expressionist KƤthe Kollwitz, and the great figure artistās philosophy on the role of art and the artist resonates throughout her work.
āShe had this obligation to use that life-drawing skill to move society ahead, to make social comment. And I believe that,ā Ruggles said of Kollwitz.
āI think those of us that draw figures, we have the capacity to say something about what it is to be a human being. ⦠We have the capacity to speak of humanness.ā
Arts Editor Anna Weltner is arts editor for New Times, the Sunās sister paper to the north. Contact her at aweltner@newtimesslo.com.
This article appears in Sep 8-15, 2011.

