As a 5 p.m. deadline loomed on June 30 for marijuana growers in unincorporated areas of Santa Barbara County to register their operations, residents packed a hearing room in Santa Maria to tell the countyās ad hoc committee on marijuana exactly what a future ordinance should regulate.
When the hearing started at 2 p.m., 437 growers had already registered with the county, and Deputy County Executive Officer Dennis Bozanich said he expected that number to increase before the close of business that day. He specified that registering a marijuana grow didnāt necessarily guarantee the registrant anything under the new ordinance, which is expected to be finalized by February 2018.
āWeāve made no specific commitments about whether that entitles them to anything,ā Bozanich told the crowd. āItās a pretty sizeable number at this point, and it could provide some priority to those who registered.ā

āAwesome,ā whispered someone in the crowd.
Those registrations will give the county an idea of whatās actually happening in the marijuana industryāand where itās happeningāBozanich said. They will help inform an economic analysis on the industryās potential effect on the county, as well as provide baseline data for the environmental analysis the countyās chosen to pursue as part of the environmental impact report (EIR) itās compiling for marijuana in the county.
The June 30 meeting in North County followed up the ad hoc committeeās first meeting on April 25 in South County. More public scoping meetings will be held in July and September, and Bozanich said he expects a draft EIR to be available for review in November.
While one public speaker implored the county not to limit the number of marijuana operations, others were concerned pot might be outlawed on agriculturally zoned land, and still others mentioned a need to educate people about the benefits of medical cannabis versus opiates. But the biggest showing outside of those in the marijuana industry came from residents of Tepusquet Canyon.
Resident Lillian Clary told the Sun that 24 neighbors showed up at the meeting to plead their case: The county should ban cannabis grows in Tepusquet. Each wore a purple visor embroidered with the words āTepusquet Canyon Crisis Committee.ā
Speakers complained about illegal marijuana growing operations, water trucks running up and down dirt roads, pesticide and chemical run-off, and the illegal clearing of native oaks and grading of roads. Residents also said they were concerned about the effects of increased water pumping on their already strapped water table and increased fire danger in an area already considered to be a high fire risk area.
āItās just not an appropriate place for that kind of cultivation,ā one resident said. āNot trying to undo the will of the people of California, ⦠just trying to look for some regulations that are appropriate.ā
The two county supervisors who serve on the subcommittee, Das Williams (1st District) and Steve Lavagnino (2nd District), said their goal was to eventually put a permitting structure in place so that the county can start taking enforcement actions against illegal players.
āInconsistencies between federal and state laws make it enormously complicated to figure out who is a bad player and whoās operating within the law or not,ā Williams said during the meeting. āThere is never going to be monitoring that takes place until there is a permit structure in place and there are permits issued ⦠There is no way this county can enforce and pay for that until there are permits.ā
This article appears in Jul 6-13, 2017.

