
A few of the charges filed against 15 Los Angeles and San Luis Obispo County residents arrested during a recent mobile medical marijuana dispensary sting didnāt stick in the courtroom earlier this month. However, itās still isnāt clear why the charges were dropped.
In the final days of 2010, roughly 50 agents from SLO Countyās Narcotics Task Force (NTF) searched the homes of mobile medical marijuana dispensary operators in SLO and Los Angeles counties.
Fifteen people were arrested over a three-day period starting Dec. 27. Among those was Richard Jones, 60, of Los Angeles, whose Santa Barbara Collective serves the Central Coast from Los Angeles to San Luis Obispo counties.
The Santa Barbara Regional Narcotics Task Force, the Santa Barbara Sheriffās Department, and the Santa Maria Police Department assisted in the operation.
Agents seized marijuana, hash, hash oil, and a small amount of cocaine from a residence in Tarzana. The entire haul was appraised by the task force at roughly $3.5 million.
In an early January phone interview with the Sun, NTF Commander Rodney John said his agents collected āconcrete proofā every person arrested in the sting had violated provisions of Californiaās medical marijuana program. (In 1996, voters approved Proposition 215, also known as the Compassionate Use Act, which exempts qualified patients and their caregivers from prosecution for possessing and cultivating cannabis.)
Apparently, the SLO County District Attorneyās Office didnāt see eye to eye with the NTF. On Jan. 11, prosecutors rejected the cases against Rachel and Charles Tamagni, who own Trilogy Health Services in Paso Robles, and Roy Allred of Atascadero-based Caanafornia Health Services.
Asked how the investigation has affected their collective, the Tamagnis said it was too soon to tell, but that they were ready to start getting their lives back together.
āBut this is just step one,ā Rachel said. āNow we have to stand by our compatriots.ā
Deputy District Attorney Jerret Gran said the charges have been kicked back to law enforcement for further investigation. He said charges could be refiled.
Steven Gordon, owner of the Pismo Beach-based collective Hopeful Remedies, pleaded not guilty to felony marijuana-related charges and child endangerment. He recounted the early-morning raid, saying agents broke down his door and pointed rifles at him and his 10-year-old daughter.
āThey ran through the house like this,ā Gordon said, indicating guns drawn, āand pointed at my childās headāand then they charge me with child endangerment?
Others who were arrested told similar stories of assault rifles, K-9 units, and helicopters.
Task force commander John said he wasnāt aware of any excessive force. But he also said there was no audio or video taken during the searches.
āActually, by law weāre not required to [record the searches],ā he said. āAnd we always look out for the civil liberties of those in custody.ā
What is recorded, however, is information in the statements of probable cause used to procure the search warrants, all authorized by Superior Court Judge Jacqueline Duffy.
According to the reports, the NTF began investigating local mobile dispensaries in October 2010. An undercover detective used fake identification and a back pain complaint to obtain a physicianās recommendation for medical marijuana.
In November 2010, agents set up a dummy apartment on the 1100 block of Leff Street in SLO. There, officers arranged deliveries with seven collectives. According to the warrants, each delivery person checked the officerās identification and physicianās recommendation before providing the marijuana.
Attorneys for the defendants contend their clients were following state guidelines set forth by the California attorney general in 2008 for medicinal marijuana. John, however, said they violated state law by accepting cash for their services.
The issue may boil down to interpretation of state law. According to Department of Justice guidelines, caregivers may receive ācertain compensationā for their services.
According to Special Agent Michelle Gregory, spokesperson for the California Department of Justice, the guidelines were originally designed to clarify āconfusingā state law for users and growers of medical marijuana.
āBut I donāt know that it has,ā Gregory said, adding that the original guidelines were drafted prior to the proliferation of brick-and-mortar dispensaries and mobile services. She said she wasnāt aware whether or not a redrafting is in the near future.
Gregory did say the sale of marijuana is illegal, and that most collectives are operating illegally by charging more than it costs to grow the marijuana, and by selling to individuals who arenāt members of their collectives.
This article appears in Jan 20-27, 2011.

