Washington, D.C., stands some 3,000 miles from the site of Mission Carmel, once the home base of Father Junipero Serra, an evangelist Franciscan from the island of Mallorca.Ā
With a bum leg and a handful of starving Spaniards, that tiny priest founded a backbone of missions in what was then called Alta Californiaāa massive hinterland of shrubs, oak, and sunāto stake out a distant colony on the remote edges of a dying empire.
And now, roughly 250 years later, Pope Francis will most likely canonize Father Serra in Washington on Sept. 23. Heās avoiding Carmel, some have told the Sun, because there are plenty in California who donāt think the church should recognize Serra as a saint. It seems like there are two sides to this saint debate: On one side weāve got people who think he was a fervent believer, driven to accomplish things for his faith at a great cost to himself, and that he demonstrated extraordinary compassion. On the other are folks who believe he was a sadist, a zealot, and party to genocide.
Serraās from another time, a period thatās alien to contemporary society and hard to understand. When he became a priest, he took the name of an early Franciscanāan order of priests founded by St. Francisāwho would give away all his clothes and walk naked in public. Serraās a strange dude. He prayed to a flying blue nun, miraculously able to be in two places at once, whose likeness was carved above the altar of his childhood church. The priest traversed much of Mexico and California on a festering leg that never healed.
His canonization raises questions that look at more than the time he spent on this earthāquestions that stem from the legacy of the mission system and what it did to Californiaās native populations.Ā
The Adolf Hitler of California?
One of Serraās loudest critics is Norma Flores of the GabrilleƱo band of Mission Indians in the Los Angeles Basin. Sheās been the public face for a group of people leading the charge against Serra.Ā
He was, she said, the āAdolf Hitler of California.ā
Spain, Flores said, had āa fine-tuned extermination machine under the guise of evangelismāāmeaning sheās accusing the Spanish of willfully decimating native populations to colonize with priests at the helm.
āThis is deep,ā she said. āItās not just one Spanish guy.ā
Her list of grievances is long. She said soldiers were sent out to rope native women like cattle and take them back to the missions; that they separated men, women, and children and interred them; and, at the hands of the Spanish, the natives were raped, whipped, and forced to work.Ā
Eventually, as Flores tells it: After being robbed of their culture, riddled with European diseases, stripped of their lands and their sources of food, crushed under the heel of the invaders, the native population of California fell to 10 percent of what it once was.
āIf the Confederate flag can be taken down, then statues of Junipero Serra can be taken down also,ā she said. āWhatās innovative about slavery? Junipero Serra brought slavery to California. He did not treat our people in a loving, compassionate manner that was in line with the teaching of Jesus Christ.ā
Flores was raised in a Catholic family. She was baptized and raised in the church. āBut my mother, who is native, did not want me confirmed,ā she said. Why? She didnāt want her daughter to be slapped by a Catholic priest, Flores explained.

And she adds that the canonization of Serra, like the rites of confirmation, would be āa final slap in the face for native people.ā
She points to a letter written by a French sea captain who visited Mission Carmel as an example of how poorly native Californians were treated. The captain compared what he saw to slavery in the Caribbean.
āWe have seen both men and women in irons, and others in the stocks. Lastly, the noise of the whip might have struck our ears, this punishment also being administered, though with little severity,ā he wrote.Ā
āIf he escapes to reside with his relations in the independent villages, he is summoned three times to return,ā the letter continues. āIf he refuses, the missionaries apply to the governor, who sends soldiers to seize him in the midst of his family and conduct him to the mission, where he is condemned to receive a certain number of lashes with the whip.ā
Flores wants that whip to descend on Serraās legacy.
āWe seek justice,ā Flores said. āJustice has no time limit.ā
The Sun reached out to the Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians, but spokesperson Hildy Medina said the tribe declined to comment.
The church
A phone call to Mission Santa Barbaraāthe only California mission to be continually occupied by Franciscan friarsāyielded no comments to questions about Juniperro Serraās upcoming canonization, but the Sun was directed to speak with Franciscan Father Ken Laverone of Mission San Juan Bautista.
Laverone said Serra saw himself as a father to the native Californiansāand saw whipping as acceptable discipline.
āBy todayās standards, you donāt do that. Serra was a man of his time, and he brought means of fatherhood, of parenting, with him. Was his intention to hurt the Indians? No. It was to teach them Godās love. But from the perspective of the 18th century, he did,ā Laverone explained.
Still, he said, Serra saw Indians not just as children, but as human beings, sometimes where other Franciscans didnāt.Ā
āI think the church sees him as a great evangelizer, as someone who left everything he knew,ā Laverone said. āHe had terrible physical problems, and he still carried on, he never stopped. Not for his own good, but for what he believed was the good of people, was the good of souls.āĀ
The force with which Serra pushed through those setbacks opened up the door for the Spanish colonization of California.Ā
āYou could not separate the evangelization from the colonization,ā Laverone said.
Mercy
That colonization made the California we know today, and SLOās Dan Krieger knows how that went. Kriegerās Catholic, an active part of Mission San Luis Obispo, and also a professor emeritus of history at Cal Poly whoās studied the mission system āsince I was 8,ā he said.
Krieger recognizes that colonialism is deplorable. His historical understanding is that political turmoil in Europe had the Spaniards looking to expand to California. He thinks Father Serra and his Franciscan brothers, while complicit in colonization, did their best to protect and minister to a native population caught between the ravages of disease and the brutality of Spanish military.

He sees Serra as a compassionate man. In one incident, Krieger recounts a story about a high-ranking Spanish officialāFages, the military governor of Californiaāwho wanted his soldiers at the Spanish fort in Monterey to have access to native women.Ā
Serra responded by moving the mission 9 miles south, away from Montereyās Presidio, so the soldiers wouldnāt get that access. He went over the heads of his superiors, pushing back hard against Fages, writing directly to the viceroy of New Spain (now known as Mexico) that āI am bringing your military governor down and he will be tried in court, and if necessary, punished by civilian authorities.ā
Krieger also points to an incident in 1775. A man was accused of killing a priest and good friend of Serraās in San Diego. Serra, once again going above the heads of his superiors, demanded that the accused not be put to death.
āSaints are people of their time and have to be judged in the context of their era. How did they behave? What qualities did they exemplify? Their purpose is to set examples in empathy, charity, and the crusading spirit of trying to change the world for what it is,ā Krieger said.
Ā He sees the idea, in Serra, of ānever giving up. He may have had a misapprehension of Godās cause.ā
Chuckling, Krieger added, āMost of us do.ā
Discipline
In the debate over canonization, whipping is a sticking point. Most of us donāt think new converts to a church should be whipped, but many converts to the mission system were. One neophyte (a new religious convert) named Francisco was tied to a whipping post in front of Dolores Missionāwhere, according to Krieger, the unlucky spectators āhad to watch as [the priest] gave 25 strokes to poor Francisco.ā
It should be kept in mind that the fathers used thick whips of cord, which does not generally break the skin, not leather, which does. The soldiers were also whipped as punishment.Ā
Krieger emphasized that the historical record shows no Indian beaten to death or flayed under the Franciscans. And, he added, common punishments at the time were horrific by comparisonālike keelhauling, where sailors were dragged along the barnacles under a ship so that their flesh was torn to pieces.
Serra, like many Catholics of the time, mortified his fleshāhe did the whipping himself, with chains or a leather cord, until his skin broke open and bled. The Vatican didnāt turn away from mortification of the flesh as penance until the late 1960s.
The San Diego History Centerās account of a sermon in Mexico describes Serra drawing out a chain, asking his audience for penance. He ābegan to beat himself so cruelly that all the spectators were moved to tears.ā One spectator came up to the altar, took the chain from the father, stripped to the waste, and beat himself while sobbing and asking for penance.
āSo cruel and pitiless were the blows,ā it reads, that the man fell down. His last rites were administered and he died on the spot.
Disease
It was the staying power of disease, not the lashes of a whip, that devastated the native population. John Johnson, an anthropologist at the Museum of Natural History in Santa Barbara, said the tragedy of the mission period is not how the Catholic priests treated the native Californians.Ā
āNo punishment was given to them that was not given to the soldiers,ā Johnson said. āColonization introduced diseases that were devastating to the native peoples that had no natural immunity.ā

By the end of the mission period in 1833ā70 years after Serraās arrival in CaliforniaāJohnson estimates that the native population had shrunk to a tenth of its pre-contact numbers.
āMost of that mortality was not major epidemics but childhood diseases,ā Johnson explained. āFour out of five children born at the missions died before they reached adulthood.ā
The Franciscans knew a little bit about medicine, but what they didnāt know was deadly. Krieger, the historian, said that they understood that quarantine worked against spread of diseases like the plague. But they believed that other illnesses were caused by vapors in the night air. So, they shuttered the Indians in small rooms with the windows closed, where bacteria festered.
Priests grew medicinal herb gardens and learned cures from indigenous peoples to stave off sickness. This was some help. But they fed them beef, which led to osteoporosis, and had them drink milk, despite their lactose intolerance. Meanwhile, Spanish cattle chomped through the seeds that native Californians foraged for food, devastating their ability to live off the land.
Scholar Barry Pritzer writes that in the early 19th century, when the mission period began, there were 200,000 indigenous people living in California.Ā
Then, in 1834, the priests were kicked out and the Mexican rancheros came in; then the Americans from eastern states, seeking gold. Each group, according to Krieger, brought disease, racist ideologies, and a greater propensity to take what remianing resources the mission Indians had.
By the end of the 19th century, according to Pritzer, only 15,000 indigenous peoples were left in California.
Serra didnāt live to see it. āHe was dead before any of that, before the high mortality began to take its toll,ā Johnson said.
The Chumash
Ernestine de Soto, an elderly nurse in Santa Barbara, knew the last living speaker of the Chumash language more intimately than anyone else. It was Ernestineās mother, who would speak it with her great uncle and the ethnologist John Peabody Harrington.
āThat wasnāt a big deal like everybody makes it out like today,ā Soto said dryly. āIt was just an everyday thing in our household. We know what we were and that was the end of that. It was a natural occurrence to us.ā

De Soto grew up in Watsonville, where there werenāt many Chumash around. āFrankly, I have to tell you, I thought we were the only ones in the world,ā she recalled. Once, there were thousands, with Spanish explorers describing the shores of what is now Santa Barbara as thronging with Chumash.
De Soto is very Catholicāāthey did their work well with us,ā she saidāand she heard that Serra would be canonized while she was working at Mission Santa Barbara.
āMy first impulse wasāāOh, my God.ā I have nothing against Father Serra, but it only meant that what happened to us was more or less justified, or OK. It was not closure,ā she said.
De Soto was caught between her ancestry and her faith when her daughter ended up in the hospital. āShe had a very bizarre cyptogenic pneumonia,ā de Soto said. It wouldnāt respond to treatment, and her daughter wasnāt getting enough oxygen to her brain.
So de Soto did what a faithful person does: She prayed. And she prayed with a piece of Serraās boneāa relic. As she tells it, Father Serra granted her the miracle that hundreds of doctors, nurses, hospital staff, and clergy couldnāt.
āSheās sitting in front of me, she should not be hereāsheās a product of his miracle,ā de Soto said.
Then, sounding weary, she paused. āI donāt think that everything would be rosy,ā she said. āAll conquering of civilizationsāyou must understand how it works. Weāre doing it right now to other people. But itās not something that Iām bitter about.
āIām grateful for what we have left,ā she added.
Staff Writer Sean McNulty can be reached at smcnulty@santamariasun.com.
This article appears in Sep 3-10, 2015.


