Saturday, October 24, 2020     Volume: 21, Issue: 34
Signup

Santa Maria Sun / News

The following article was posted on August 19th, 2020, in the Santa Maria Sun - Volume 21, Issue 25 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from Santa Maria Sun [santamariasun.com] - Volume 21, Issue 25

Local oil industry faces uncertainty after Phillips 66 announces refinery shutdown

By Malea Martin

Phillips 66, which operates a major Santa Maria oil pipeline as well as the Santa Maria oil refinery on the Nipomo Mesa, announced on Aug. 12 that it plans to shut down the refining facility starting in 2023. 


WHAT COMES NEXT?
Phillips 66 announced the closure of its Santa Maria refinery and pipelines on Aug. 12, throwing the future of jobs and oil operations into question.
FILE PHOTO BY STEVE E. MILLER

The announcement came exactly one week after the Santa Barbara Planning Commission voted to approve a one-year extension on TerraCore’s proposed Foxen pipeline, a 2.9-mile pipeline that would connect the Cat Canyon oil field to the existing Santa Maria Phillips 66 pipeline. The proposal would replace the current practice of trucking crude oil from Cat Canyon.

Without the Phillips 66 pipeline to connect to as proposed, it’s unclear what the Foxen project’s future holds.

“In association with the planned closure of the Santa Maria refining facility, our crude oil pipelines located in Santa Barbara County will be taken out of service in 2023 while we consider potential alternate uses for them,” Phillips 66 representative Joe Gannon said via email.

TerraCore didn’t respond to a request for comment before press time.

The other question that looms with the announcement is what will happen to those employed at the Santa Maria refinery, which according to Phillips 66’s website has 140 full-time employees. While Phillips 66 announced plans to transition the company’s San Francisco refinery into a renewable fuel plant, it is unclear whether the company’s Santa Maria’s refinery will see the same outcome.

When asked if Phillips 66 had any concrete plans to supplement the loss of Santa Maria refinery jobs with something similar to its plans for San Francisco, Gannon’s answer referred to the state’s energy market.

“California market conditions support an energy transition to renewable fuel production,” Gannon wrote. “The current configuration of the refinery is not economically viable to continue its production of traditional fossil fuel products.”

Glenn Morris, president and CEO of the Santa Maria Valley Chamber of Commerce, told the Sun that he was concerned about potential job loss.

“Any time that we lose a couple of hundred good paying jobs in the region, it’s a blow,” Morris said. “There will certainly be ripple effects as those families either have to relocate or find other ways of making a living.”

He added that fully transitioning those careers into renewable energy jobs may not be an easy feat.

“While I think we all support a move to renewable energy and cleaner sources of energy, I think it’s difficult to envision a reality where those new sources come online at commercial scale, and fast enough, to fully replace some of the traditional sources,” Morris said.

ExxonMobil could also be affected by the decision to close the Santa Maria refinery. 

The company’s Santa Ynez Unit consists of three offshore oil drilling platforms, which have been out of operation since the May 2015 Refugio oil spill. ExxonMobil hopes to resume operations with a proposal to temporarily transport oil using tanker trucks. 

According to Santa Barbara County’s recently released environmental impact report on the proposed project, the trucks would take crude oil from the company’s Las Flores Canyon facility and then deliver to either the Phillips 66 Santa Maria Pump Station or the Plains Pentland Terminal in Kern County. 

“We are evaluating how [the Phillips 66 refinery closure] may affect our application for temporary trucking,” ExxonMobil spokesperson Julie King said in an emailed statement.

A press release from the Environmental Defense Center called on ExxonMobil to withdraw the trucking project.

“ExxonMobil’s proposal was already ill-conceived from an environmental and climate justice point of view, and now it is unsuitable in light of Phillips’ plans to convert its refinery to renewable fuels,” center Chief Counsel Linda Krop said in the release. “There is even less reason now for ExxonMobil to put our coast and communities at risk.”









Weekly Poll
How do you feel about the propositions on this year's ballot?

It takes a lot of research to understand them.
There are too many proposed efforts in each.
I don't vote on them; it's a waste of time.
I only vote on the props I care about.

| Poll Results






My 805 Tix - Tickets to upcoming events