Wednesday, September 28, 2022     Volume: 23, Issue: 30

Santa Maria Sun / News

The following article was posted on December 23rd, 2014, in the Santa Maria Sun - Volume 15, Issue 42 [ Submit a Story ]
The following articles were printed from Santa Maria Sun [] - Volume 15, Issue 42

Judge rules that Phillips 66 news media policy violates the law


In late 2012, amid labor negotiations between management and employees at the Phillips 66 refinery in Santa Maria, the company emailed a news media policy to employees prohibiting them from speaking to reporters.

But on Nov. 25, a National Labor Relations Board administrative law judge found that the policy violated federal labor law. The ruling is the latest stemming from a complaint over labor disputes submitted to the board by five employees working as health and safety specialists at the Santa Maria refinery. They alleged that management threatened them with reprisal in a January 2012 meeting if they voted for union representation, and then the company proceeded to carry out those threats, according to court documents.

Phillips 66 might have to rethink its news media policy at the Santa Maria refinery due to a judge’s recent ruling.

Specifically, Labor Relations Board Judge Lisa D. Thompson ruled that the Phillips 66 media policy violates section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, which prohibits employers from interfering with employees’ rights to organize.

The email Phillips sent appeared in the ruling. In part it states: “If a Phillips 66 employee or on-site contractor is contacted by a member of the news media, no information exchange is permitted concerning Santa Maria or Rodeo Refinery operations.” 

In a Sun article published in April of this year, the company defended the policy as routine business practice. Joe Stuligross, associate general counsel for United Steelworkers, told the Sun that the policy violated the law. Stuligross couldn’t immediately be reached for comment. A message the Sun left with United Steelworkers Local 534 in Grover Beach seeking comment wasn’t returned before press time.

According to case documents, attorneys representing Phillips 66 argued in court that the policy was meant to prohibit employees from speaking on the company’s behalf about any confidential operations.

But the judge rejected this argument, saying the policy was ambiguous and violates the law because employees could “reasonably construe” that it would prohibit them from discussing, among other things, labor disputes or conditions of work.

Reached by email last week, Phillips 66 spokesperson Dennis H. Nuss said the company is aware of the recent decision, but didn’t make specific comments about the case.

However Nuss did write: “Our company’s top priority is the safety of everyone who works at our sites and lives in our neighboring communities. In 2012, Phillips 66 redistributed certain safety-related functions and responsibilities among personnel at the Santa Maria Refinery, and there were no staff reductions. These changes have helped maintain and improve the refinery’s high standards for safety performance.”

Read the New Times cover story: Re(de)fining safety (December 13th, 2012).

Weekly Poll
What are some of the priorities you want candidates to address this election?

Homelessness. Our state needs to address this growing issue and come up with creative solutions.
Mental health programs. We need more investments in programs to address staffing shortages and growing needs.
Climate change. I'd like to see initiatives like clean energy and wind farms move forward.
Our state is beyond fixing and there's nothing we can do.

| Poll Results

My 805 Tix - Tickets to upcoming events